Conspiracy Facts-Now we know what “Covid 19” was really about.

superbeast said:
Hired because they know they did nothing wrong? Haha. yep, usually.

nationalfile.com

GEORGIA: Fulton County Election Board Hires Top Criminal Defense Attorneys After Judge Allows 2020 Election Audit

High-end lawyers beg Georgia court to "stay these proceedings" after Judge grants motion to allow absentee ballots to be inspected
nationalfile.com nationalfile.com
Click to expand...
i dont see the significance of this. perhaps you can explain?

edit, this is from wikipeadia:
Fulton County is one of the most reliably Democratic counties in the entire nation. It has voted Democratic in every presidential election since 1876 except those of 1928 and in 1972, when George McGovern could not win a single county in Georgia.
Click to expand...
i think it would be more controversial if they voted republican
 
Last edited:
Rationalwiki is about as far from objective as you can get. It's openly radically left.

"He is most notorious and obnoxious online for his ableism and calling transgender people, liberals, feminists and pretty much anyone with left-wing political views who merely disagrees with him as "mentally ill"." As if transgender people aren't objectively suffering from a mental illness?

"Ableism"



Proof of election fraud was when Jack Dorsey casually admitted to curating what was allowed on his platform in order to influence the election.
 
Last edited:
Evil Spock said:
i dont see the significance of this. perhaps you can explain?

edit, this is from wikipeadia:

i think it would be more controversial if they voted republican
Click to expand...
Again, if you followed what was going on outside media biased headlines and talking points, i wouldnt have to explain the significance. Do your own research.
From Wikipedia? Hahaha. Who gives a flying fuck what wikipedia says?
 
Evil Spock said:
interesting but not conclusive
Click to expand...
Which? Dr Yan?
She had done many in depth interviews. Nothing will be “conclusive” as there will always be politics involved, but i think the circumstantial evidence is more than any reasonable jury would need at this point. Again, that is only for people that put in the time and effort to understand all sides of the story.
 
superbeast said:
Again, if you followed what was going on outside media biased headlines and talking points, i wouldnt have to explain the significance. Do your own research.
Click to expand...
i did. it says some people hired lawyers. anyone can do that. it doesnt refute that even trumps hand picked supreme court judges that the liberal media had hysterical fits over as being insane and extremists, wouldnt hear because lack of evidence. did the illuminutty get to them too?
superbeast said:
From Wikipedia? Hahaha. Who gives a flying fuck what wikipedia says?
Click to expand...
it is cited information. you didnt refute the facts.
 
here is a good criticism of how covid was handled was handled and why the lab leak theory was covered up from a impartial new source.
 
Evil Spock said:
i did. it says some people hired lawyers. anyone can do that. it doesnt refute that even trumps hand picked supreme court judges that the liberal media had hysterical fits over as being insane and extremists, wouldnt hear because lack of evidence. did the illuminutty get to them too?

it is cited information. you didnt refute the facts.
Click to expand...

Lack of evidence was it? Pretty sure they were never allowed to present any of the evidence due to a claim of lack of standing. A bit of a difference there.
And Wikipedia, that is nothing more than the authors opinion. No different then websters dictionary these days. Just keep updating depending on the lefts non sense and talking point of the day.
 
Evil Spock said:
are you saying that kirkagarrd guy is a real journalist and not a troll?

thats not fraud.
Click to expand...
I am saying that Rationalwiki is openly radically left, and using their ad hominem attacks to discredit someone else doesn't hold much value, and that we're all better off discussing the actual substance of the conversation instead of slinging around "child porn advocate" claims since this isn't twitter.

It's not fraud from a legal perspective, but it most certainly is open manipulation of public opinion by a single person with an excessive amount of power in an unprecedented way that the laws could have in no way predicted or been ready for. If you think these socially media gods controlling that amount of information and its availability on what is essentially a public message board is completely appropriate and not worthy of discussion then its only because they're currently on your side.

I think a really relevant example of this is how you would be banned from these platforms for saying that covid came from a lab literally two weeks ago. Being able to control the public's narrative to this extent is not an intended feature, and certainly not one we should be okay with.
 
Evil Spock said:
here is a good criticism of how covid was handled was handled and why the lab leak theory was covered up from a impartial new source.
Click to expand...


The Hill is impartial? Seriously?
Media has been coming right out and sayiNg the story was suppressed because they were scared it would help Trumps reelection! Their political rivals. The msm hid the truth of the virus that shut down the whole fucking world for political gain!
Karmas a bitch.
 
superbeast said:
The Hill is impartial? Seriously?
Media has been coming right out and sayiNg the story was suppressed because they were scared it would help Trumps reelection! Their political rivals. The msm hid the truth of the virus that shut down the whole fucking world for political gain!
Karmas a bitch.
Click to expand...
Why do these media companies think that they get to define themselves as impartial? If you have "bipartisan" in the first sentence of your youtube description thats cause for suspicion, not reason to trust them?

If a headline on a website says "FACT CHECK", does anyone seriously think " oh well that must be the truth then" you'd have to be fucking retarded I swear to god.

Its like listening to fauci about covid, he fucking caused it; its a little bit of conflict of interest?

or billy owner of vaccine patents gets to decide what happens with vaccines?

Or like oh ya for sure the CIA director said it on Joe Rogan it must be true. fuck operation mocking bird just put the guy on the morning news and he can just tell everyone what to believe flat out

I swear to god like what happened to subtlety they dont even try anymore
 
Last edited:
BCbabyB said:
I am saying that Rationalwiki is openly radically left, and using their ad hominem attacks to discredit someone else doesn't hold much value, and that we're all better off discussing the actual substance of the conversation instead of slinging around "child porn advocate" claims since this isn't twitter.

It's not fraud from a legal perspective, but it most certainly is open manipulation of public opinion by a single person with an excessive amount of power in an unprecedented way that the laws could have in no way predicted or been ready for. If you think these socially media gods controlling that amount of information and its availability on what is essentially a public message board is completely appropriate and not worthy of discussion then its only because they're currently on your side.

I think a really relevant example of this is how you would be banned from these platforms for saying that covid came from a lab literally two weeks ago. Being able to control the public's narrative to this extent is not an intended feature, and certainly not one we should be okay with.
Click to expand...
so you just want to change the topic. ok
 
superbeast said:
Lack of evidence was it? Pretty sure they were never allowed to present any of the evidence due to a claim of lack of standing. A bit of a difference there.
Click to expand...
prove it
superbeast said:
And Wikipedia, that is nothing more than the authors opinion. No different then websters dictionary these days. Just keep updating depending on the lefts non sense and talking point of the day.
Click to expand...
no. its not. its stated as a fact. so it would be either a truth or lie
 
Evil Spock said:
prove it

no. its not. its stated as a fact. so it would be either a truth or lie
Click to expand...
Prove what? Sorry you are too lazy to do things on your own.
Why even engage in these conversations when all you can ever come up with is basically “i know you are, but what am i” LMAO
 
Evil Spock said:
ok.
OMG! the illuminutty got to federal election
Click to expand...
Then what is the big deal with doing a forensic audit then? They should want it right away and very public so they can shut down Trump
For good. The more they try and hide and interfere, the longer the Qanons can make these silly right wing white supreme accusations. Lets do one of these fact checks on the election.
 
superbeast said:
Then what is the big deal with doing a forensic audit then? They should want it right away and very public so they can shut down Trump
For good. The more they try and hide and interfere, the longer the Qanons can make these silly right wing white supreme accusations. Lets do one of these fact checks on the election.
Click to expand...
ok . changing topic. i donno. why not another election?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top