I'm not the biggest fan of sarms.
I use mk677.. technically not a sarm.. but it has many benefits.
Sarms can't be compared to steroids.
But they all have a place and give different results.
It's to vague a question to answer specifically.
For example like tren vs deca ... both do two totally different things.. but both give results.
I do use caradine on occasion when I'm on a tren cycle... it combats some of the sides.
Many sarms lower testosterone... so that's something to consider.
But like steroids.. using sarms messes with your body and hormones... so do a lot of research... get blood work done.. and stay safe.
It helps with sleep... my skin looks better... some fat loss.. and I had some lingering injuries from years ago that I don't feel anymore.What results are you getting from mk677?
You just can't compare SARMs to AAS.Which SARM is good for bulking/ cutting ?How do they fair against AAS?
The bloat bit annoys me. Thats what i hate about deca and dbol lol. did you feel you gained any lean mass with it ? Or was it just watery gains ?It helps with sleep... my skin looks better... some fat loss.. and I had some lingering injuries from years ago that I don't feel anymore.
It increases the amount of GH your body produces.
I keep it to 25mg/day.
But like everything there are sides... lethargy, numb hands, bloat among others.
I personally tolerate it well.
But if you are expecting a magic pill, it definitely isn't that.
Nothing will ever replace a good diet, hard work training, lots of sleep and keeping track of blood work/listening to the Dr.
Name of the game is to stay healthy.
SARMs and AAS are no joke, they should never be taken lightly.
My fasted blood sugar levels were fine.Also what about your sugar levels? Did yoj monitor that mate ?
What about low test with a sarm then in place of something mild? Ive had great results from some sarms. And always run a low dose of test along side.i dont see the point of sarms being that they dont aromatize and are still suppressive. wouldnt it better just to use low test stacked with something mild?
Yes!i dont see the point of sarms being that they dont aromatize and are still suppressive. wouldnt it better just to use low test stacked with something mild?
fair enough. never thought of that. problem i see is i think most people arent doing that. i think most are doing sarms as an alternative to test.What about low test with a sarm then in place of something mild? Ive had great results from some sarms. And always run a low dose of test along side.
I think its the $$$ cost issue with SARMs and the lack of research behind them. I've used LGD4033 and Ostarine both off gear and on gear. I think a moderate dose of test paired with any AAS oral would yield way better results.I took RAD140 at 30mg a day and LGD3303 at 15/20mg a day
I was using around 300-350mg test e per week. And I was in pretty good shape I can put up some pics. This is just test and the two sarms. I cannot remember if I ran it 8 or 10 weeks but it was in that ballpark.
Its not some elite physique but people who bash sams maybe havent used the right ones the right way.
Everyone may have their own thoughts on them. Sure you wont get steroid results but you can get great results. Ive had great runs with them and even with the cycles Ive done with them cost the same if not a but less than full AAS only cycles.I think its the $$$ cost issue with SARMs and the lack of research behind them. I've used LGD4033 and Ostarine both off gear and on gear. I think a moderate dose of test paired with any AAS oral would yield way better results.
Do SARMs work? Absolutely. I dont think you can compare them with AAS though.
I can add to that analogy... the Ferrari might win .. but depending on the grade of gas you use (food) and the quality of oil (nutrients) .... then that Ferrari or Yamaha won't be making to many runs down the track before needing costly repairs!@ABMonkey
If I haaad to make a comparison of SARMS to AAS
It would be a Yamaha R6 (Sarms) to a Ferrari (steroids)
Off the line it would be close.. but in the end, the Ferrari (AAS) would always win.
Both can be exciting though !
Which is a very good point to add! Always need those to be accounted for with both or youre tossing money down the drain, gains that could of been, just gone.I can add to that analogy... the Ferrari might win .. but depending on the grade of gas you use (food) and the quality of oil (nutrients) .... then that Ferrari or Yamaha won't be making to many runs down the track before needing costly repairs!