There is this cool thing called the internet. You go to whatever politicians page and read.How could you even tell what his platform was? He looked like a schoolyard bully picking a fight and Trudeau had no choice but to respond or look like a patsy.
Sheer started that shit and seriously turned my stomach on him because he looked like a rabid American politician. I still don't know the majority of his platform because I don't care to know. I don't trust the man.
It's like Dougie "The Diaper" Ford bawling his eyes out when he should be showing strength. He could literally start shitting 24k bricks of gold and I'm still going to see him as unfit to lead a whole lot of people who are relying on strong leadership right now.
I rarely post in these types of threads cause it turns into a much work project but I appreciate those who do no matter their opinion, so don't expect a further reply.
If you can't find massive amounts proof of the censorship within 30 secs of punching in a query at duckduckgo (note not google) then you are not even trying to see both sides of this.
Steven Crowder routinely puts out content that might open your eyes.
Also check out Project Veritas videos of CNN Exec straight up admitting it. And then getting twitter acct perma banned. Maybe FB too.
I rarely post in these types of threads cause it turns into a much work project but I appreciate those who do no matter their opinion, so don't expect a further reply.
If you can't find massive amounts proof of the censorship within 30 secs of punching in a query at duckduckgo (note not google) then you are not even trying to see both sides of this.
Steven Crowder routinely puts out content that might open your eyes.
Also check out Project Veritas videos of CNN Exec straight up admitting it. And then getting twitter acct perma banned. Maybe FB too.
That’s the hard part. And in today’s world my kids have misplaced my surfaces laptop, wtf.I wanna say lots of stuff too but I can’t thumb it out on the phone
I said not to expect a reply but this response makes no sense the way it's written, perhaps you'd like to reword? Not trynna be a dick, I just don't get your point cause of the sentence structure.I’ll take any a summation of 100 citations, from true academic or research sources, as proof that that millions of citation that the whole situation is what it is.
See, you are asking for proof of censorship while you pretend it doesn't exist. FB, Twitter, youtube, google, all the liberal news outlets have all openly stated that they will ban and censor anything that goes against their narrative. And they are following through with it. If this is news to you then you have not been paying attention. It's no secret and isn't even debated.I’ll take any a summation of 100 citations, from true academic or research sources, as proof that that millions of citation that the whole situation is what it is.
Touché!How often did things make sense in your day-to-day pre-COVID world? Your world was often like mine in that you were left shaking your head over decisions made- or not made.
I believe the same thing. But ford visibly changed somewhere about 8 months ago maybe.I know that, but you cry at home, not in front of the troops.
As he imposes lockdowns, and gives us instructions he is the one everyone is looking up to, wether you like him or not.
But breaking down on tv IMO was not a wise move. Now the confidence I had in him is gone. Any decision he makes in the future I will wonder if it was made because he was weak, or afraid.
I was going to say the same. Well, pit bull's aren't particularly bright, but I'm thinking something far more clueless and without an aggressive bone in its body. Watching him in the debate he seemed like an utter clown. All I recall him saying, and I'm paraphrasing, was Trudeau bad, Trudeau bad. He seemed to lack the ability to articulate, or perhaps that's the ability to think, either way I know some lifelong conservatives who wouldn't vote for him after that. Singh presented the most clearly, well articulated platform, and his ability to debate was unmatched.Scheer was a pit bull, lol.
I need examples of that.
Yep.I believe the same thing. But ford visibly changed somewhere about 8 months ago maybe.
you could see it in his eyes and how he carried himself on camera.
I think he is defeated.
Singh jumps on every bandwagon. Oh, I’ve felt racism as well. When Trudeau was getting all the hair comments, he had to bring out his hair. Also as long as he’s feeling the power, he will prop up Trudeau on any issue. He will sell out for a slice. But I don’t really blame him on that, they will likely never hold power, so he going for what he can get.I was going to say the same. Well, pit bull's aren't particularly bright, but I'm thinking something far more clueless and without an aggressive bone in its body. Watching him in the debate he seemed like an utter clown. All I recall him saying, and I'm paraphrasing, was Trudeau bad, Trudeau bad. He seemed to lack the ability to articulate, or perhaps that's the ability to think, either way I know some lifelong conservatives who wouldn't vote for him after that. Singh presented the most clearly, well articulated platform, and his ability to debate was unmatched.
What lack of integrity were you referring to previously? It is b/c he's propped up the liberals? My understanding was that he did that b/c they were supposed to support his Pharmacare plan. Unfortunately, the Maritime liberals fucked him over, which was a very greasy move.
I'm sure Singh has no love for Trudeau, but he is in a tough spot, b/c the conservatives would never support a PharmaCare plan. We are the only wealthy country with universal health care, but no universal drug coverage. The irony is that it would be a net benefit. It would not only save households, but private payers, as well as lowering the costs of drugs as a whole.
Oh and as for Pharmacare, I have not looked into that. Well since I’m not on medication of any sort I done understand. But I know the price of drugs in Canada is far cheaper than the USA by compairson.I was going to say the same. Well, pit bull's aren't particularly bright, but I'm thinking something far more clueless and without an aggressive bone in its body. Watching him in the debate he seemed like an utter clown. All I recall him saying, and I'm paraphrasing, was Trudeau bad, Trudeau bad. He seemed to lack the ability to articulate, or perhaps that's the ability to think, either way I know some lifelong conservatives who wouldn't vote for him after that. Singh presented the most clearly, well articulated platform, and his ability to debate was unmatched.
What lack of integrity were you referring to previously? It is b/c he's propped up the liberals? My understanding was that he did that b/c they were supposed to support his Pharmacare plan. Unfortunately, the Maritime liberals fucked him over, which was a very greasy move.
I'm sure Singh has no love for Trudeau, but he is in a tough spot, b/c the conservatives would never support a PharmaCare plan. We are the only wealthy country with universal health care, but no universal drug coverage. The irony is that it would be a net benefit. It would not only save households, but private payers, as well as lowering the costs of drugs as a whole.
I've never seen Biden cry and that man has truly cares AND has a world of shit on his shoulders. The republican senate has never, not ever been more fucked up and mental than right now. Four of them are still actively spewing pro Trump lies.There is this cool thing called the internet. You go to whatever politicians page and read.
Trudeau deserves what he gets, he avoids questions by answering with spewing bullshit about stuff completely unrelated. He egged it on as much as Scheer brought it.
The the crying thing by Ford was a disappointment. But in all reality most of us will never experience the level of stress he is right now.
Why did we go to the USA.I've never seen Biden cry and that man has truly cares AND has a world of shit on his shoulders. The republican senate has never, not ever been more fucked up and mental than right now. Four of them are still actively spewing pro Trump lies.
Why does everybody go to the "he had years to do" thing. He was a Democrat senator in a senate that is generally republican or enough republican to filibuster. One man can't do much alone. The fact he's served his country for 40 years means more to me than some piece of shit republican senator who admits being in Qanon and people just accept it.Why did we go to the USA.
Biden only came in in the last 1/4. Ford was there from the start,
And the democrats produced their own problems. Telling everyone to keep rioting, and unlike what Biden believes the vaccine rollout was there long before him, lol.
Biden is senile. He had years to “do something good” and he didn’t do much.
The average person loved the economy Trump created. I just hope we don’t get the same mail in voting system.
It’s in plane english. It summarizes in lay: provide any combination of 100 papers which are peer reviewed proving contrary to lockdowns, vaccinating and covid being real. Articles must also be used as reference proving their authenticity. This is the academic world.I said not to expect a reply but this response makes no sense the way it's written, perhaps you'd like to reword? Not trynna be a dick, I just don't get your point cause of the sentence structure.
You definitely don't appear to be responding to the part about censorship though, which is weak because I led you to some undeniable stuff with very little effort. You would have to put the effort in from this point on if you do actually wish to have a balanced view of this situation.
Cheers
Let's be clear. I address(ed) you with no ill intent whatsoever and I'm not even arguing with you. All I'm saying is that if you drop the bias the info is out there. Obviously you did not have a good look at the two leads I gave you because they provide tons of peer reviewed studies if you take the time to actually seek them. I believe that I said from the start I would not do the work for you, if you choose to remain only partially informed that's up to you. I suspect that Confirmation Bias has reared it's ugly head here.It’s in plane english. It summarizes in lay: provide any combination of 100 papers which are peer reviewed proving contrary to lockdowns, vaccinating and covid being real. Articles must also be used as reference proving their authenticity. This is the academic world.
Covidiotisim needs to be sensors no question.
again, a few credible cited and referenced research papers from credible institutions supporting your claim. And I will reevaluate my opinion.
Other then that I rest my case
Attacking my language skill? I’m writing non a phone, I could not careless how my English rolls of here.Let's be clear. I address(ed) you with no ill intent whatsoever and I'm not even arguing with you. All I'm saying is that if you drop the bias the info is out there. Obviously you did not have a good look at the two leads I gave you because they provide tons of peer reviewed studies if you take the time to actually seek them. I believe that I said from the start I would not do the work for you, if you choose to remain only partially informed that's up to you. I suspect that Confirmation Bias has reared it's ugly head here.
Now to turn slightly more negative and actually off topic. If that first post was "plane" english to you either english is not your first language or whatever education system you went through failed you sorely.
Furthermore - "Articles must also be used as reference proving their authenticity." That's absolutely ridiculous. Like almost beyond discussing on a serious level. At first I thought you meant it as a joke but then you had the gall to follow it with "This is the academic world." Any academic I know would laugh in your face at the first assertion.
You do you but 'resting your case' without considering all the evidence hardly makes sound sense but apparently you don't want to hear it.
Good Luck to you Sir.
I'm out.