Conspiracy Facts-Now we know what “Covid 19” was really about.

L
resilient1 said:
I find that odd as well, but one thought is that the larger cities do offer a lot more opportunity. Take the plastic surgeon who was critical to making the case for, and then the 16.5hr surgery that saved my leg. He was eventually recruited by the Toronto Hospital to lead their breast reconstruction team for women who had mastectomies. He then became the corporate chief of surgery for 3 hospitals in Toronto. I read that he also runs a plastic surgery clinic. This guy is a machine, and I have nothing but complete irreverence for people who do not appreciate the talent, skill, and sacrifice of such exceptional individuals. I should mention that he obtained his plastics-surgery specialization from UCLA, but chose to return to Ottawa. What a great Canadian!

Kingston (Queen's) has a great medical program, a teaching hospital, but the difference in population likely makes it hard for doctors to specialize, or aspiring specialists to get the recognition they need to become the next leaders in their field. Larger cities means larger hospitals, and a larger pool of professionals to work alongside and learn from.

That being said, I think Kingston is a great little city, very livable.
Click to expand...
like I said it likely the pressure on our healthcare from all the seniors. 50% at least of our population is elderly. A lot of people from GTA move here because you still get the water, all services, and a lower cost of living.
I’d bet older people use healthcare services more. Buddy of mine Chaser lives in GTA and he is shocked how I can’t easily get a doctor.
I know when I was in the hospital 3 times for my colon, I felt extremely young, lol, and I’m not young.
When I got the surgery done at 47, I was likely 25 years younger than everyone else I saw. Btw, I was moving around to heal, so I got a good idea of who was in the 3 wards around me.
Actually I heard the nurses make a comment about why am I still here, I’m never in my room to check my vitals, lol. It was noisy in the room, those old people are snoring, coughing, farting machines. I slept in the visitor area, no visitors at night and there was a big couch. Turn on the tv and passed out. It was easier o get off the couch then out of the bed anyways.

They usually keep you a week, they sent me home in 3 days, I was back to work in a week.
 
Cog said:
No your rationale is daft.
Cardiology is a branch of internal medicine.
Specialists
Click to expand...

I'll play your little game, but first allow me to refresh your memory,

I said: Anyone I know who has been to the heart institute in Ottawa raves about the quality and immediacy of care.

Your nonsensical reply: Of course,it's in Ottawa. What would you expect?

By definition, a heart institute would require a cardiologist or two, lol. But, having a staff of cardiologists does not guarantee a standard of excellence. Nor, does the geographic location. It may be well-funded as a result of it's location, however, the Mazankowski Alberta Heart Institute in Edmonton is a world leader in complex cardiac care.

The location is irrelevant, it's the standard of care, excellence in research, procedure, personnel, and management that contributes to its world class reputation, no differently than the Alberta Heart Institute.

I think you like to take any opportunity to shit on info I post, which is your right on this board. And, going forward feel free to comment all you like, but I will not reciprocate. I do not know you, and I have no personal issue with you, but it's best I not continue.
 
Sorbate said:
L

like I said it likely the pressure on our healthcare from all the seniors. 50% at least of our population is elderly. A lot of people from GTA move here because you still get the water, all services, and a lower cost of living.
I’d bet older people use healthcare services more. Buddy of mine Chaser lives in GTA and he is shocked how I can’t easily get a doctor.
I know when I was in the hospital 3 times for my colon, I felt extremely young, lol, and I’m not young.
When I got the surgery done at 47, I was likely 25 years younger than everyone else I saw. Btw, I was moving around to heal, so I got a good idea of who was in the 3 wards around me.
Actually I heard the nurses make a comment about why am I still here, I’m never in my room to check my vitals, lol. It was noisy in the room, those old people are snoring, coughing, farting machines. I slept in the visitor area, no visitors at night and there was a big couch. Turn on the tv and passed out. It was easier o get off the couch then out of the bed anyways.

They usually keep you a week, they sent me home in 3 days, I was back to work in a week.
Click to expand...

I get that. During my time in hospital following my accident I was in a room with two older gentlemen who would complain constantly about being disturbed late at night or early in the morning. I had to have an ultrasound on the graft of my leg every six hours, b/c of the heavy IV meds, mainly the antibiotics, I had to have my IV changed every 6 hours, same with the pads all along where I had grafts taken, and the fluid bulbs in my back.

The nurses complained to the administration and they provided me with a private room with windows on two sides, which was very nice. By far I was the youngest person on that floor. It's a sad fact that most families are unable to have enough children to maintain a balance in population growth to offset our increasing elderly population. It's considerably worse in other countries, but it is what it is. There is no easy fix. I have great respect for my father's and his father's generation, they built this country, worked hard, and earned the benefits and services upon which they now depend.

I am most concerned for my niece's generation. Things need to improve drastically for that generation to have the same access and quality that we have now. It's a bit of depressing thought, but I'm also hungry. I've waited too long to eat.
 
resilient1 said:
I'll play your little game, but first allow me to refresh your memory,

I said: Anyone I know who has been to the heart institute in Ottawa raves about the quality and immediacy of care.

Your nonsensical reply: Of course,it's in Ottawa. What would you expect?

By definition, a heart institute would require a cardiologist or two, lol. But, having a staff of cardiologists does not guarantee a standard of excellence. Nor, does the geographic location. It may be well-funded as a result of it's location, however, the Mazankowski Alberta Heart Institute in Edmonton is a world leader in complex cardiac care.

The location is irrelevant, it's the standard of care, excellence in research, procedure, personnel, and management that contributes to its world class reputation, no differently than the Alberta Heart Institute.

I think you like to take any opportunity to shit on info I post, which is your right on this board. And, going forward feel free to comment all you like, but I will not reciprocate. I do not know you, and I have no personal issue with you, but it's best I not continue.
Click to expand...
Locations are not irrelevant.
Mazankowski Foundation is in Alberta.
Albertans donate more.
Because of the economy,driven by oil,they are able to do so.
See how that works?
The facility in Ottawa is there because it's Ottawa,nothing more
 
Would be funny if someone could hack NFL for first game and play this song when they try to replace their anthem with this so called black anthem they talking about.

 
resilient1 said:
I get that. During my time in hospital following my accident I was in a room with two older gentlemen who would complain constantly about being disturbed late at night or early in the morning. I had to have an ultrasound on the graft of my leg every six hours, b/c of the heavy IV meds, mainly the antibiotics, I had to have my IV changed every 6 hours, same with the pads all along where I had grafts taken, and the fluid bulbs in my back.

The nurses complained to the administration and they provided me with a private room with windows on two sides, which was very nice. By far I was the youngest person on that floor. It's a sad fact that most families are unable to have enough children to maintain a balance in population growth to offset our increasing elderly population. It's considerably worse in other countries, but it is what it is. There is no easy fix. I have great respect for my father's and his father's generation, they built this country, worked hard, and earned the benefits and services upon which they now depend.

I am most concerned for my niece's generation. Things need to improve drastically for that generation to have the same access and quality that we have now. It's a bit of depressing thought, but I'm also hungry. I've waited too long to eat.
Click to expand...

We are not replacing our population but it is being replaced thru immigration, which is fine, just hopefully the new people like our ways, lol. Mind you it is the minority that is controlling the majority now, so it will be fine, lol (I’m talking old stock Canadians, no matter race)
Mind you lowering the population on the earth is not a bad thing. Our resources will last longer and so will the earth.
Honestly our quality of life is so outstanding right now, that even if it went back to what it was like in the 50’s we would still be high on the hog.
 
Sorbate said:
I guess like anything, it is which area you are in.
I know Kingston has been having a hard time retaining doctors. Don’t know why it’s a great place to live and not expensive.
Could be our very high senior population that is creating a drain on resources. Old people need lots of fixin, lol.
Click to expand...

Where did you get that info from? It's nowhere near what I know of Kingston.

Doctors - Family and General Practitioners - Kingston - southeasthealthline.ca

Local health services, news, careers and events for South East, Ontario including Rural Hastings, Quinte, Rural Frontenac, Lennox and Addington, Kingston, and Lanark, Leeds and Grenville
www.southeasthealthline.ca www.southeasthealthline.ca

 
Sorbate said:
We are not replacing our population but it is being replaced thru immigration, which is fine, just hopefully the new people like our ways, lol. Mind you it is the minority that is controlling the majority now, so it will be fine, lol (I’m talking old stock Canadians, no matter race)
Mind you lowering the population on the earth is not a bad thing. Our resources will last longer and so will the earth.
Honestly our quality of life is so outstanding right now, that even if it went back to what it was like in the 50’s we would still be high on the hog.
Click to expand...
I'm all for fewer people. 2-3 billion fewer would be ideal, that is, I would prefer to be living at a time when there were 3 billion, which was 1960, 2.5B in 1950's. The only way that would happen is if there were another virus, but that one had an incubation period of, say 4-6 weeks, was highly infectious within days, and had a severely high mortality rate which only suddenly emerged at the very end of the incubation period. However, that sort of carnage would create absolute chaos, and for those who survived, it would be a horrible reality. Survival of the fittest.

There's no quick fix to the degradation of our planet. Nothing sort of a severe crisis, and that won't be a smooth transition...

In the immortalized words of Heath Ledger, and the greatest portrayal of the Joker,

 
superbeast said:
Would be funny if someone could hack NFL for first game and play this song when they try to replace their anthem with this so called black anthem they talking about.

Click to expand...


I'm sure that song made him some $$. HWJ knows damn well that the values Americans hold so dear, their cherished liberties and freedom of expression, give those players every right to take a knee. Imo, he should know better than to make such a statement, but that too is his right.
 
resilient1 said:
I'm sure that song made him some $$. HWJ knows damn well that the values Americans hold so dear, their cherished liberties and freedom of expression, give those players every right to take a knee. Imo, he should know better than to make such a statement, but that too is his right.
Click to expand...

He also knows very well of the double standards when it comes to politics in the USA. Like that time he made a joke about Obama comparing him to Hitler and was fired from Monday night football. Now a commentator would be fired for not calling the current president Hitler. LOL.
 
resilient1 said:
I'm all for fewer people. 2-3 billion fewer would be ideal, that is, I would prefer to be living at a time when there were 3 billion, which was 1960, 2.5B in 1950's. The only way that would happen is if there were another virus, but that one had an incubation period of, say 4-6 weeks, was highly infectious within days, and had a severely high mortality rate which only suddenly emerged at the very end of the incubation period. However, that sort of carnage would create absolute chaos, and for those who survived, it would be a horrible reality. Survival of the fittest.

There's no quick fix to the degradation of our planet. Nothing sort of a severe crisis, and that won't be a smooth transition...

In the immortalized words of Heath Ledger, and the greatest portrayal of the Joker,

Click to expand...

I was watching a show about dangerous roads, trucks, they were hauling cotton in Africa, the people have nothing, but keep having children, but then can’t get basics like water or food. Why do they keep having children in mass?
 
superbeast said:
He also knows very well of the double standards when it comes to politics in the USA. Like that time he made a joke about Obama comparing him to Hitler and was fired from Monday night football. Now a commentator would be fired for not calling the current president Hitler. LOL.
Click to expand...
I get your point, but criticizing the president, never a wise career move, especially when you are the face of Monday night football/widely associated with football in general. The NFL doesn't need that sort of negative publicity, and I'm sure they were dealing with enough blowback at the time from the CTE revelations. I'm sure he wishes he could take it back.
 
Sorbate said:
I was watching a show about dangerous roads, trucks, they were hauling cotton in Africa, the people have nothing, but keep having children, but then can’t get basics like water or food. Why do they keep having children in mass?
Click to expand...
Infant mortality rate is high for one, but it's cultural. Plus, similar to 100 years ago, it takes many hands to provide for a family. The older siblings help raise the younger ones, and there a consistent cycle. My great-grandmother had 12 children, 1 died in child birth, and the older kids tended crops, took care of the younger one's, their father worked long days. I don't know if it was an Irish thing, but 11 seems excessive, but they all have done well in life, and I'm sure my great-grandmother's parents had lots of kids. I know Irish families were encouraged to have plenty of children. Religious influence. But, from what I've read it was mainly necessity, and a sort of an enterprising mindset. The more kids you have, the more chances the family as a whole gains influence and wealth. Many kids mean greater earning potential, which raises the family up, esp in agrarian/manual labour cultures.

Those are just my impressions. My great-grandparents on my father's side had 6 kids, and same deal, many hands helped out. My grandfather was working winters in logging shanty towns by 14 to earn money for the family. They had 4 boys, and 4 hardworking boys can improve the opportunities of a working farm, buying more lands, which increases earning potential.

All I do know is there's a huge cultural component, and there are good reasons for it, b/c why else would they do it?

I had a friend who traveled to Africa with her folks. She said they are some of the most remarkable people. They have so little, but are such a positive, warm, and open people. Too many do not realize how good we have it.
 
resilient1 said:
Infant mortality rate is high for one, but it's cultural. Plus, similar to 100 years ago, it takes many hands to provide for a family. The older siblings help raise the younger ones, and there a consistent cycle. My great-grandmother had 12 children, 1 died in child birth, and the older kids tended crops, took care of the younger one's, their father worked long days. I don't know if it was an Irish thing, but 11 seems excessive, but they all have done well in life, and I'm sure my great-grandmother's parents had lots of kids. I know Irish families were encouraged to have plenty of children. Religious influence. But, from what I've read it was mainly necessity, and a sort of an enterprising mindset. The more kids you have, the more chances the family as a whole gains influence and wealth. Many kids mean greater earning potential, which raises the family up, esp in agrarian/manual labour cultures.

Those are just my impressions. My great-grandparents on my father's side had 6 kids, and same deal, many hands helped out. My grandfather was working winters in logging shanty towns by 14 to earn money for the family. They had 4 boys, and 4 hardworking boys can improve the opportunities of a working farm, buying more lands, which increases earning potential.

All I do know is there's a huge cultural component, and there are good reasons for it, b/c why else would they do it?

I had a friend who traveled to Africa with her folks. She said they are some of the most remarkable people. They have so little, but are such a positive, warm, and open people. Too many do not realize how good we have it.
Click to expand...
Thing is though, there is not enough basic resources, so extra lives will not increase your wealth but increase your burden.
On the farm in Ireland you had more kids you could grow more crops, but there are resources, water wasn’t limited, grow all the potato’s you want to feed your 20 kids.
They live on dirt, walk miles for water, wait for food rations.
This is what this one area province (if that’s what they are called in Africa) was like.
I still don’t understand the mindset. You can’t eat, but then you have children, and no one eats, they die, you have another?
 
resilient1 said:
I get your point, but criticizing the president, never a wise career move, especially when you are the face of Monday night football/widely associated with football in general. The NFL doesn't need that sort of negative publicity, and I'm sure they were dealing with enough blowback at the time from the CTE revelations. I'm sure he wishes he could take it back.
Click to expand...

Well the NFL is planning on replacing the national anthem for a week for some virtue signalling, so negative publicity doesnt seem to be an issue. Lol
Anyway, it was ESPN not NFL. Funny part is a couple years later, they had the Jemel Hill or whatever call the current president of the USA a white supremest and no action was taken. Complete double standard. Which is the real “new normal” we have been living in for the past few years.
 
superbeast said:
Well the NFL is planning on replacing the national anthem for a week for some virtue signalling, so negative publicity doesnt seem to be an issue. Lol
Anyway, it was ESPN not NFL. Funny part is a couple years later, they had the Jemel Hill or whatever call the current president of the USA a white supremest and no action was taken. Complete double standard. Which is the real “new normal” we have been living in for the past few years.
Click to expand...
Yeah really,bad man to criticize Obammy but not Trump.
Entertaining to say the least.
 
superbeast said:
Well the NFL is planning on replacing the national anthem for a week for some virtue signalling, so negative publicity doesnt seem to be an issue. Lol
Anyway, it was ESPN not NFL. Funny part is a couple years later, they had the Jemel Hill or whatever call the current president of the USA a white supremest and no action was taken. Complete double standard. Which is the real “new normal” we have been living in for the past few years.
Click to expand...
Perhaps it's just me, but I feel as though racial tensions are at an all-time high. And, Trump has not done enough to castigate the white is right crowd. Those morons are part of his base and he knows it. That's why he flip-flopped in his comments criticizing those who were present at the Charlottesville protests. Trump brings that upon himself, and I have no sympathy for stupidity and lack of insight. Take his criticism of Nascar for the removal and ban on the Confederate flag. It's not his place, but he says these things to curry favour with that class of neanderthal voters. There's no class or leadership there, a great leader forms coalitions, demonstrates strength through empathy and compassion, and builds bridges in the face of adversity. Trump is shallow, petty, and fails at every level of leadership.

People are too quick to forget how much Obama did for the U.S. He took that country at the worst time since the great depression and turned things around. His presidency was challenging from the very beginning, but he had to settle and withdraw from a war he did not start.

Why not compare Obama's presidency at the end of 2015 to Trump at the end of 2019?
At the end of Obama's second term he had created 11.8 million jobs.
At the end of 2019, employment had increased by 5 million.

Unemployment under Obama decreased by 4.7%, Trump, by 3.8%.

To expand on that,
The unemployment rate at the beginning of Obama's first term, when the financial crisis was at its worst, was 7.8, and it peaked at 10% in Oct 09, before ending at 4.7%. His presidency coincided with the second largest decrease in unemployment in history. Second only to Kennedy/LBJ.

There was an increase of 105% new jobs under Obama, but only 26% under Trump.

Corporate profits rose 55% under Obama, only 12% under Trump (recall the Trade war, more on that later..)

GDP under Trump only grew by 1.6% in 2016, 2.2% in 2017, and in 2018 he managed to get it back to where is was when Obama left office.

The number of people without health insurance decreased by 15 million under Obama, it is increased by 1 million under Trump.

About that trade war, and tax cuts, b/c he's so good at sticking it to other countries, right?

The greatest tax cut benefits will be to corporate profits, investment income, estate taxes, and financial service companies. These are most advantageous to the wealthy.

Trump's trade negotiations cost consumers and U.S. companies more than 40B, and reduced economic growth by nearly 0.5%. Farmers required 28B in federal bailout money.
Who really pays for the import tariffs? U.S. consumers. There was a total of $250B in tariffs imposed by Trump, but this has barely impacted imports b/c it's still far more expensive to produce those goods domestically, so U.S. consumers have to suck it up and pay more.

Remarkable job you fat orange-faced fuck.
 
Sorbate said:
Thing is though, there is not enough basic resources, so extra lives will not increase your wealth but increase your burden.
On the farm in Ireland you had more kids you could grow more crops, but there are resources, water wasn’t limited, grow all the potato’s you want to feed your 20 kids.
They live on dirt, walk miles for water, wait for food rations.
This is what this one area province (if that’s what they are called in Africa) was like.
I still don’t understand the mindset. You can’t eat, but then you have children, and no one eats, they die, you have another?
Click to expand...
I don't know about that. From what I saw and have read they aren't that bad off. I'm not saying they have it good, but in many places it's not as bad as you may be lead to believe. Sure, there are smaller villages here and there, but that's not the norm. It's a large continent, and although there are some very poor areas, it's not a uniform state of existence by far. I wish I could recall where my friend traveled. Many had small farms. One thing I noticed about non-white and non-Asian students in university, they always studied in groups. Of course, there were groups of white students and Asians on occasion, but with other ethnicities, i.e. Middle Eastern and African, they were always studying together. It's admirable, supporting one another and persevering through community. Learning is easier when you have multiple minds tackling a subject or problem.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top