I truly don't care which provinces you live in. But at the tender age of 4 years old did you truly consent to your precious private medical information being shared by your parents? What they did is absolutely no different than what the government is asking of businesses today.also, to no surprise you again are incorrect about proof of vaccine for attending school as a kid. Only 2 provinces in Canada have that requirement, neither of which I have lived in. Schools can ask you, but you have the freedom not to answer.
I believe you're the one that's mistaken. "Coercion … occurs if and only if one person intentionally uses a credible and severe threat of harm or force to control another". So by not allowing the unvaccinated to eat at their local burger king, I'm genuinely confused how that is even remotely considered medical coercion. Nobody is putting a gun to your head, nobody is threatening you with torture, nobody is threatening to kidnap your children or kill your family. Nobody is holding you down and injecting you without your consent. THIS IS NOT COERCION and I don't care how you want to spin it. By the very definition of the word coercion THIS DOES NOT QUALIFY.That is the large difference here, we are talking about informed consent and medical freedom. Well, atleast one of us is…
Actually, McDonald's is being taken away. And if you truly think our government is doing this to pad the pockets of a McDonalds, Walmart, Amazon... AKA all these AMERICAN companies you're listing you need to come out from under your tinfoil hat.you know what isn’t being taken away? McDonald’s, Walmart, Amazon, tobacco & alcohol, big pharma dollars spent brainwashing and weaponizing tards like you against the last free thinkers on earth.
I truly don't care which provinces you live in. But at the tender age of 4 years old did you truly consent to your precious private medical information being shared by your parents? What they did is absolutely no different than what the government is asking of businesses today.
I believe you're the one that's mistaken. "Coercion … occurs if and only if one person intentionally uses a credible and severe threat of harm or force to control another". So by not allowing the unvaccinated to eat at their local burger king, I'm genuinely confused how that is even remotely considered medical coercion. Nobody is putting a gun to your head, nobody is threatening you with torture, nobody is threatening to kidnap your children or kill your family. Nobody is holding you down and injecting you without your consent. THIS IS NOT COERCION and I don't care how you want to spin it. By the very definition of the word coercion THIS DOES NOT QUALIFY.
Actually, McDonald's is being taken away. And if you truly think our government is doing this to pad the pockets of a McDonalds, Walmart, Amazon... AKA all these AMERICAN companies you're listing you need to come out from under your tinfoil hat.
I truly don't care which provinces you live in. But at the tender age of 4 years old did you truly consent to your precious private medical information being shared by your parents?
Nothing to add to the convo you fellas are havin but what do you mean by this part? Any links or leads to where this is explained? First I've heard anything like this is all....
Actually, McDonald's is being taken away. ...
You conveniently left out the word "force" in your oxford dictionary quote. It actually states by use of force or threats.OXFORD Dictionary definition of coercion..
“Coercion is compelling a party to act in an involuntary manner by use of threats”
so threatening to lose your job, not be able to see a dying family member in hospital, etc etc are all ways to coerce you into INVOLUNTARILY get a medical procedure.
They are not doing it yet.....You conveniently left out the word "force" in your oxford dictionary quote. It actually states by use of force or threats.
And then there's the cambridge dictionary. "the use of force to persuade someone to do something that they are unwilling to do".
Maybe the collins dictionary? "Coercion is the act or process of persuading someone forcefully to do something that they do not want to do."
At the end of the day, my statement stands. There is no medical coercion going on here. Nobody is being forced to do anything. Our government has not once used force or threats or any sort of physical action on anybody to make them get a vaccine against their will.
Our government also has no control over the private sector so there are no threats of losing your job. This is why you hear so many people saying "It makes no sense I need to be vaccinated to eat at a restaurant but the wait staff serving me doesn't need to be". They can't control what a private company does with their employees. If McDonalds chooses to require their employees to be vaccinated, that's on McD's not on the Government. But the government can control what is and is not allowed in a public space. And whether that be needing a vaccine to eat at a restaurant, or needing to wear pants at the mall, or not being allowed to whip your cock out and jerk off on the ice at a hockey game in front of 20,000 people, it all falls under the same category.
They also control whether you can shoot someone in the head or not. Is that a violation of your freedoms as well? I'm assuming not because it seems pretty common sense not to do it, but how is it any different? Just because you disagree with a rule doesn't mean they're out to get you.
At the end of the day, my statement stands. There is no medical coercion going on here. Nobody is being forced to do anything. Our government has not once used force or threats or any sort of physical action on anybody to make them get a vaccine against their will.
Our government also has no control over the private sector so there are no threats of losing your job. This is why you hear so many people saying "It makes no sense I need to be vaccinated to eat at a restaurant but the wait staff serving me doesn't need to be". They can't control what a private company does with their employees. If McDonalds chooses to require their employees to be vaccinated, that's on McD's not on the Government.
Corporations have zero choice, well businesses. Either you follow the law, or get shut down. Not everyone will or can afford to destroy their income. The government knows this.And....
When all of us conspiracy nuts were viewing leaked documents and white papers about the coming vaccine passports in the spring of 2020, a year and a half before they became fact, and the TV zombies said “the government could never do that” I would saythey dont have to. The corporations will do it for them.
A year and a fucking half ago.
To quote Steven Bannon, there are no conspiracies, but there are no coincidences either.
Yeah.Corporations have zero choice, well businesses. Either you follow the law, or get shut down. Not everyone will or can afford to destroy their income. The government knows this.
It’s amazing the power lobbying has, lol.Yeah.
I am talking big corporations.
WEF and Bilderburg members.
The policy makers.
Yep.It’s amazing the power lobbying has, lol.
Thing is if only a few big corporations were doing it, it would be tough to implement. It’s the millions of small businesses that will be forced to that will turn the tide.
I bet once the QR codes get in, you’ll be restricted at grocery stores as well. Compliance has to happen at any cost. We can get delivery, so our freedoms will still not be compromised.
I have already started.Yep.
The UN is working on a global “health pass” system right now with of course the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation. Block chain tech. And of course it will include your carbon credits, probably the new global digital currency and of course it will be linked to your social credit score, so time to start deleting any history “offensive” social media posts!!
I bought a flip phone a couple weeks ago. No data on it at all.I have already started.
This isn’t really private either.
Trust me if they wanted to find out who we are they can. A buddy of mine used to do it for fun.
2/3 times he had it right.
‘Soon as in another month I’m going to become invisible, delete everything and disappear online as far as this goes.
‘I do not like the way the world is going. I’m going to pretend I’m back in 1995, when I didn’t own a computer.
‘I’m also getting rid of my cell phone. I don’t need it. I only have one customer who texts me, he can leave emails.
You know truthfully, I miss the 90’s. Without social media, you met your friends, had fun did stupid stuff. No worries about about if your ideals alined with others, because everyone wasnt so divided. If you argued, you had a couple more beers and moved on and talked about something else.I bought a flip phone a couple weeks ago. No data on it at all.
Yeah it can be tracked, but without the iphone my online activity will be about 80% less.
Not so much to Hide, just to walk away from this abortion called society the most i can. .