Hopefully your friend can debunk everything before it becomes conspiracy fact. Until then, here is a quote I found from the HC website.
“Once the product is on the market, the manufacturers (AstraZeneca Canada Inc. and Verity Pharmaceuticals/Serum Institute of India (SII)) are legally required to submit reports of adverse events to Health Canada.
The manufacturer is planning to follow clinical trial participants for at least 1 year after the second dose of the vaccine is given. It must communicate any safety concerns to Health Canada.”
Maybe you can ask your friend if they are supposed to get Informed consent before people enrol as unwitting participants. Mr
@Bagua , Did your family members have to sign a consent form or anything? Or are they using implied consent instead of informed consent?
So many questions. Can you ask why the AstraZeneca product name has been changed? There must be some sort of legal obligations due to the specific permissions given. Or are we still being given old batches?
Can you also ask why they have remdesivir as an approved treatment when it was declared over priced and useless to treat covid? And ask why other proven treatments like hcq, azithromycin, ivermectin aren’t listed? Hey! Conspiracy back story time.
Did you know that in order to obtain EUA, there can be no other approved treatment. HCQ was being used by doctors in countries around the world. Ruh-roh!! Well wouldn’t you know, somebody published an unpeer reviewed hit piece saying it caused scaring of the heart. The WHO and CDC jumped on it and banned the use of hcq. And the msm ran the story nonstop. Obviously the study was attacked and discredited. Just as the pen was touching the EUA papers the WHO ever so quietly retracted their blacklisting. One more coincidence. About the same time, the worlds second largest pharmaceutical factory producing the main precursor to HCQ exploded. Shortage! Thank goodness for vaccines.
Actually the billion dollar question is, If the main factor to qualify for a EUA (lack of treatments) is not met, then why is Canada allowing the roll out of an unapproved vaccine at all?? Yikes! She might actually get fired for asking that.
You may not buy into the whole Great Reset, Agenda 21 etc but these companies stand to make $100bil/year profits. If you don’t think that’s enough of a motive to rush an unproven treatment out then I don’t know what else is. I don’t watch tv, but I’m willing to bet dollars for donuts that you are seeing a whole lot more vaccine and medical commercials. That's the media’s kickback. Running 24/7 fear porn for a price. You do also realize these vaccine companies have a long history of killing and maiming and controversy right? I'm not sure why it is so far beyond the realm of thought that they might be at it again.